Skip to main content

Torture is immoral, illegal and irreconcilable with this nation’s most cherished values. If defenders of the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program disagree, they should come out and say so. Instead, they blow smoke.
That is the opening paragraph of Here’s an emotional response to the torture report: I’m outraged,  Pulitzer Prize winner Eugene Robinson's column for Tuesday's Washington Post

It is as powerful as anything Robinson has ever written, as should be clear from the opening words.

After quoting Diane Feinstein saying that she had instructed the committee staff to let the facts speak for themselves, he responds simply

Those facts, from what we know so far, are appalling.
He notes the committee vote to release the report was 11-3, and this is, for your interest, on a committee whose membership includes 8 Democrats and 6 Republicans.

Robinson notes that major portions of the report may never be declassified, and then writes

Forgive me for getting emotional, but this is an outrage.

It was Justice Louis D. Brandeis who remarked that “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” Torture is a stain on this nation’s honor that can be bleached away only by full exposure. Feinstein’s committee spent years finding out what really happened. I should have a right to know what my government did in my name.

Or perhaps we should put it as we used to see on this site, Never in Our Names.

Please keep reading.

Robinson reminds us that a man whom the CIA waterboarded more than 80 times probably gave up his useful information to an FBI interrogator before he was ever waterboarded.

He posits for sake of argument that someone in custody gives up a piece of useful information after being waterboarded 37 times -  does that mean we should waterboard him another 37?  Can we even say we could not have gotten the same information with no waterboarding?  He says advocates of torture cannot answer definitively that we could not.

Robinson then writes

This is an argument about worldviews, not about facts, and it ignores the heart of the matter. The reason to fully examine the CIA’s torture program isn’t that it was ineffective. It’s that it was immoral.
And of course, it was also illegal under US Law and international conventions which we have ratified., and remember -  according to Article VI a ratified treaty is consider part of the supreme law of the land.

Jose Rodriguez, who directed the program for the CIA and who ordered the destruction of the tapes made of the CIA interrogations, clearly must have been worried about what those tapes would show.

That's what Robinson writes.

Perhaps there is another reason -  it would be what the tapes would NOT show - any usable and/or meaningful intelligence as a result of the clearly demonstrated violation of US and international law, and of a principle established by George Washington who prohibited the torture of prisoners in the hands of his army.

Then there are also those others who may have participated.  As Robinson writes,

Among many unanswered questions, I want to know whether trained medical personnel — physicians, psychologists — attended the torture sessions. I’m sure the relevant professional associations and licensing boards would like to know as well.
Except we already know that parts of the enhanced interrogation techniques were designed by people who had run the SERE program (survival, evasion, resistance, escape) program to which combat pilots and others were exposed as part of their training.  These were mental health professionals, and issues were raised about stripping them of their credentials.

Robinson is outraged.

He wants the report released.

I do not think he goes far enough.

If this kind of practice is acceptable for Americans, done in our names by our government, then I am not sure I want to be an American.

Democracies should not torture - anyone, anyplace, anytime.

There are some lines that simply should not be crossed.

These are crimes against humanity.

Our refusal to hold those who did it to account makes those giving them a free keep out of jail card as culpable themselves.

And yes, that includes Leon Panetta as Director of Central Intelligence.

It includes Eric Holder as Attorney General.

And it most definitely includes Barack Obama, during whose presidency those who committed these horrid crimes were allowed to walk away from responsibility for their evil.

Outraged is simply not a strong enough word.

It needs to be accompanied - by shame, disgust, horror...

We can start with outrage.

But unless we demand accountability, it can and will happen again.

And then our shame will be compounded.

What American Exceptionalism is this?

Read the Robinson.

I feel no peace . . . .

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site